Abortifacient Contraceptives

In America, chemical abortions are estimated to kill more than 7 million babies each year — while surgical abortions kill about 1.5 million babies each year.

http://www.prolife.com/BIRTHCNT.html

WOW! You may think that the pill is keeping you from getting pregnant and keeping you from having abortions, but you may have become pregnant, took the pill, and killed your child without knowing it at all! It IS possible!

Birth control pills are routinely described as “contraceptives”, that is, things that prevent conception, the beginning of a new human life. But in fact birth control pills sometimes act as “abortifacients”, things that cause abortion.

Birth control pills act in three basic ways: (This information can be obtained from any standard reference work, such as the Physicians’ Desk Reference.)

  1. They suppress ovulation, that is, they prevent the woman’s body from releasing an egg.
  2. They thicken the woman’s cervical mucus, which makes it more difficult for sperm to reach the egg.
  3. They alter the lining of the uterus so that the zygote (fertilized egg, the first stage in the life of a human being) cannot implant. The developing baby receives his oxygen and nutrition through the uterus, so if the zygote-baby cannot implant, he starves to death. This is, therefore, an abortion.

There are basically three types of birth control pills:

  • high-dose, progestin and estrogen;
  • low-dose, about half as much progestin and estrogen; and
  • mini-pill, small amount of progestin, no estrogen.

The early high-dose birth control pills acted primarily by suppressing ovulation. Studies found that these pills succeeded in preventing ovulation somewhere between 90 and 98% of the time. However, high-estrogen pills are no longer available in Canada or the United States . They were removed from the market because of various dangerous side effects.

The newer low-dose pills are less effective at preventing ovulation and therefore rely more on the remaining two functions. As an egg is microscopic, it can be difficult to tell in any given case whether an egg really has been released. But Dutch gynecologist Dr Nine Van der Vange made an extensive study of women using these pills. She found proof that an egg had been released in 4% of the cases, and found follicle growth typical of what one finds in early pregnancy in at least 52% of cases. The workings of the mini-pill are not fully understood, but it appears to allow ovulation at least 40% of the time, according to Emory University’s Contraceptive Technology. Ovulation expert Dr. John Billings estimates that between 2 and 10 per cent of a woman’s cycles are still ovulatory even when she is taking the Pill. That means there is a chance she can still conceive a child; but because of the Pill’s effect on the lining of the womb, the child will not be able to implant, and will be expelled from the mother’s body. Although this might seem to be a small percentage risk, over time the likelihood is great. Moreover, there really is no such thing as a “negligible” risk of aborting a baby. In this case, any risk is too great.

http://web.archive.org/web/19990423191719/http://www.ohiolife.org/aborters/facient.htm

One should not take the pill because there is a GREAT risk that she is having a non-surgical abortion very early in the pregnancy. The people who prescribe the pill don’t mention this, do they?

The Intra-Uterine Device (I.U.D)

    The I.U.D. is a specially shaped piece of plastic or metal that must be inserted into the uterus by a doctor. Although it is not known for sure how it works, it is believed that an I.U.D. changes the lining of the uterus to prevent the fertilized egg from being implanted [emphasis added]. It may also slow the sperm down enough to prevent it from reaching the uterus.

Contraceptive abortions

Some people have moral objections to contraception in principle. But that is not the issue here. Even those who see no moral distinction between preventing pregnancy through contraception and avoiding pregnancy through abstinence, must still object to any birth control method that relies, even a small percentage of the time, on destroying a life that has already begun. It has been said that birth control pills usually act by contraception, that any abortions that result should be accepted as an unfortunate accident. This is a little like saying that it’s alright to fire a gun randomly in the dark, as you usually won’t hit anybody, and in the few cases when you do, it should be accepted as an unfortunate accident.

http://web.archive.org/web/19990423191719/http://www.ohiolife.org/aborters/facient.htm

Truly, I don’t believe in contraception at all. Why would one take the pill if there is no chance that she will get pregnant? One should not be worried about becoming pregnant before marriage: if one gave her gift away, she is probably going to get a new gift: a baby. Any woman should EXPECT it. Married women should not be taking the pill especially because bringing a baby into the world and carrying it in your body is the one thing that men can not do, so they should be proud of it. One should only have kids when they are married, it is a gift that they should use wisely and give to the one man who deserves and respects it. All I can say about having children is wait until marriage.

1 comment to Abortifacient Contraceptives

  • LoveLife

    Life can be quite complicated and not so black and white. This sounds all very grand in writing, but practice may prove difficult. Also what about married couples who have repeated pregnancies and are now putting the mother’s life at risk or the quality of life for her children are being comprimised. I agree abortion is cruel and I believe most females are acting out of fear and are not empowered with information. But contraception is a responsible way of attempting to manage birth control. It would be idealistic to say men should be responsible for their sperm upon ejaculation but in reality a woman can only rely on herself, even if you have been married for years and had completed your family. It would be idealistic to think a husband would get a vasectomy so the wife didn’t need to take hormones, or that one would use a condom every time, but realistic life doesn’t always work out in such a controlled way. We need to stay open minded.

Leave a Reply